Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2
Date: 2005-12-06 08:25:45
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E6AD@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
> Sent: 06 December 2005 05:24
> To: Marc G. Fournier
> Cc: Robert Treat; Dave Page; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2
>
> Marc,
>
> > Basically, if Josh et al wish to develop a KB outside of
> the community,
> > there is nothing stopping the community from developing
> their own within
> > it *shrug*
>
> IN WHAT WAY is pgFoundry "outside the community"?

It's kinda like discussing development of the JDBC driver on the
pgInstaller project site. It's a community site for sure, but it's quite
clearly still not the appropriate place the the JDBC part of the
community.

Do you remember the number of people for various places that were irked
by being told to go and discuss certain aspects of backend development
on the Bizgres list? This is pretty much the same problem, only it's
even harder to see how the Kenninsgres list *is* the right place to
decide (amongst other things) what CMS to use. It's akin to using the
Microsoft Office news group to discuss whether to use MS Word or KWord!

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-12-06 08:44:33 Re: Co-admininning pgsql-announce
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-12-06 08:19:48 Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2