Re: Co-admininning pgsql-announce

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Co-admininning pgsql-announce
Date: 2005-12-06 08:44:33
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7CD9@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> re: postings to pgsql-announce ... as I've told others, if
> you post something, send me an email directly to let me know
> and I can login right there and then to process it through ...
>
> re: reply-to ... sure, but it won't fix your bounce issue,
> since things like postmaster and mailer-daemon don't honor
> reply-to's, as far as I know ... or do they?

They most definitly shouldn't. (That said, I'm sure there are some that
do. But even M$ Exchange doesn't :P)

There is, however, an Errors-To header you can set. Far from all mailers
support that one, but some do. And IIRC there is an RFC about it
somewhere, so it's not home-invented.

> regardless if they do or not, teh reply to needs to be set to
> something legit, so where would you have it set to? pgsql-general?

Yes, the Reply-To is for human responses. So setting it to a different
list seems quite reasonable.

//Magnus

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-12-06 08:56:49 Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-12-06 08:25:45 Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2