From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Shachar Shemesh" <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz> |
Cc: | <pginstaller-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence |
Date: | 2004-09-29 10:34:20 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E430677B@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net]
> Sent: 29 September 2004 11:32
> To: Dave Page; Shachar Shemesh
> Cc: pginstaller-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence
>
> Are you sure? From what I can tell we only need to do that if
> our release note mentions features or use of OpenSSL... Which
> we might want to do, but as long as we don't, we shuold be safe.
We used to mention it in pgAdmin notes as it was an oft-requested
feature. When we next publicise the release of pginstaller with working
SSL support, I'm pretty sure we'll probably mention it there as well.
> Also, not sure if a release note qualifies as advertising material.
Good point.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-09-29 10:49:42 | Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-09-29 10:31:52 | Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence |