From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Shachar Shemesh" <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz> |
Cc: | <pginstaller-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence |
Date: | 2004-09-29 10:49:42 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE456A02@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> > Are you sure? From what I can tell we only need to do that if our
> > release note mentions features or use of OpenSSL... Which we might
> > want to do, but as long as we don't, we shuold be safe.
>
> We used to mention it in pgAdmin notes as it was an
> oft-requested feature. When we next publicise the release of
> pginstaller with working SSL support, I'm pretty sure we'll
> probably mention it there as well.
>
> > Also, not sure if a release note qualifies as advertising material.
>
> Good point.
Might want to contact the openssl guys and ask? They say "In case of any
license issues related to OpenSSL
please contact openssl-core(at)openssl(dot)org(dot)".
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-09-29 13:36:20 | Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-09-29 10:34:20 | Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence |