Re: Ready to roll beta

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>
Cc: <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ready to roll beta
Date: 2004-09-08 08:13:49
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A7A65@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 08 September 2004 09:06
> To: blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr
> Cc: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
>
> Well, this is an unfortunate situation. Beta1 win32 should
> roll ASAP to be included in pginstaller Beta2 (which is
> overdue), but we need time for *ix.
>
> I'd vote for making a code freeze now, bumping up the version
> to Beta1 now, but delaying cvs tagging until all
> configuration stuff is fixed.
>
> This way, we can get Beta1 for win32 out now, and have the
> time to tidy up for *ix beta.

Hmm, I'm not convinced the fc2 issue is one we can fix anyway (it's
trying to execute the right file, just seems to be failing because it's
a symlink - which shouldn't happen of course). The other issue is the
'f' key on Debian - are we simply waiting for confirmation that the
newer compiler resolves that?

Also, don't forget that everything at release is built from the source
tarball, and not CVS (at least it should be). So once that is created,
that's it.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2004-09-08 08:28:58 Re: Ready to roll beta
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-09-08 08:05:36 Re: Ready to roll beta