From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: using slony with pgadmin |
Date: | 2004-12-11 12:31:17 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B486@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
-----Original Message-----
From: pgadmin-support-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Andreas Pflug
Sent: Tue 12/7/2004 5:45 PM
To: Robert Treat
Cc: pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] using slony with pgadmin
Robert Treat wrote:
>> Hmm... I guess these must be pgadmin II tables? Honestly I am not sure, the
>> client uses both pgadmin II and III, so I thought that's where they were
>> coming from. Here is the schema I'm talking about:
>>
>> live=# \d pga_*
>> Table "public.pga_forms"
>> Table "public.pga_layout"
>> Table "public.pga_queries"
>> Table "public.pga_reports"
>> Table "public.pga_schema"
>> Table "public.pga_scripts"
> Clearly pgaII. Replication probably not necessary.
Not pgadmin 1, 2 or 3 - maybe pgAccess?
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pico | 2004-12-11 13:12:40 | Re: crash |
Previous Message | Ivan | 2004-12-11 11:26:00 | Bug in a table properties dialog |