From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions |
Date: | 2006-06-23 07:10:15 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388B0D@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Dunstan
> Sent: 22 June 2006 23:09
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Bort, Paul; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
>
>
>
> Something has broken Cygwin in the last 18 days ;-(
Is there any real reason to continue to support Cygwin? We've always
said it's not a first class port, and now we have the native port which
is it seems somewhat pointless expending further effort on it.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-06-23 07:29:28 | Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-06-23 06:08:45 | Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on |