Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
Date: 2006-06-23 12:26:41
Message-ID: 449BDE01.4050301@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:

>
>Is there any real reason to continue to support Cygwin? We've always
>said it's not a first class port, and now we have the native port which
>is it seems somewhat pointless expending further effort on it.
>
>
>
>

Some people still use it for development, I believe. Similar arguments
were used against our having the Win32 port in the first place.
Personally I am inclined to support whatever platforms we reasonably
can, and leave the choice to users rather than make it for them.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD 2006-06-23 12:41:09 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Previous Message Mark Woodward 2006-06-23 11:57:38 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC