| From: | Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Dell Hardware Recommendations |
| Date: | 2007-08-10 19:42:58 |
| Message-ID: | E519A947-4DEC-448D-BA86-E3B0471C3968@khera.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Aug 9, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Joe Uhl wrote:
> PowerEdge 1950 paired with a PowerVault MD1000
> 2 x Quad Core Xeon E5310
> 16 GB 667MHz RAM (4 x 4GB leaving room to expand if we need to)
> PERC 5/E Raid Adapter
> 2 x 146 GB SAS in Raid 1 for OS + logs.
> A bunch of disks in the MD1000 configured in Raid 10 for Postgres
> data.
I'd avoid Dell disk systems if at all possible. I know, I've been
through the pain. You really want someone else providing your RAID
card and disk array, especially if the 5/E card is based on the
Adaptec devices.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2007-08-10 20:07:26 | SQL question: checking all required items |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-08-10 19:11:34 | Re: PITR for postgresql-7.3 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-08-10 20:03:19 | Re: CLOG Patch |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2007-08-10 19:33:28 | Bitmap Index Scan optimization opportunity |