| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: CLOG Patch |
| Date: | 2007-08-10 20:03:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1186776199.4505.39.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 13:54 -0400, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> I tried with CLOG 24 also and I got linear performance upto 1250 users
> after which it started to tank. 32 got us to 1350 users before some
> other bottleneck overtook it.
Jignesh,
Thanks for testing that.
It's not very clear to everybody why an extra 100 users is useful and it
would certainly help your case if you can explain.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-08-10 20:05:13 | Re: Bitmap Index Scan optimization opportunity |
| Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2007-08-10 19:42:58 | Re: Dell Hardware Recommendations |