From: | Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
Cc: | Joe Kramer <cckramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Best practice to grant all privileges on all bjects in database? |
Date: | 2006-05-25 22:33:25 |
Message-ID: | E4617B6A-43F1-4194-914C-8E67800F455E@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On May 24, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:59:06 +0300,
> Joe Kramer <cckramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On a related note, which objects need to be GRANTed specifically?
>> There is a saying that following objects can have permissions
>> GRANTed:
>> 1. TABLE
>> 2. DATABASE
>> 3. FUNCTION
>> 4. LANGUAGE
>> 5. SCHEMA
>> 6. TABLESPACE
>>
>> What about SEQUENCE, TRIGGER? PostgreSQL manual has no mention
>> about this.
>
> Did you look at:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-grant.html
Only helps if the OP is willing to run on HEAD; grant on sequence is
not in 8.1 (at least not according to the docs).
As for triggers, I don't really see how that would make any sense.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-05-25 22:41:34 | Re: move from 1 database to another |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-05-25 22:27:13 | Re: What to expect when mixing inherited tables and different schemas while dealing with functions and views? |