| From: | Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Joe Kramer <cckramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Best practice to grant all privileges on all bjects in database? |
| Date: | 2006-05-25 23:51:09 |
| Message-ID: | 200605252051.10257.jgodoy@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Em Quinta 25 Maio 2006 19:33, Jim Nasby escreveu:
>
> Only helps if the OP is willing to run on HEAD; grant on sequence is
> not in 8.1 (at least not according to the docs).
>
> As for triggers, I don't really see how that would make any sense.
A trigger could start some modification in a table where the user has no
direct access to, e.g. a logging table. By granting access to the trigger
and making the trigger able to access that table, then the operation could be
completed and data could ba safe from users. I dunno, though, if the
permissions set to the function would allow that...
--
Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | carlos.reimer | 2006-05-26 01:06:15 | LDAP authentication |
| Previous Message | Jorge Godoy | 2006-05-25 23:48:16 | Re: What to expect when mixing inherited tables and different schemas while dealing with functions and views? |