From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: Fix ancient bug in parsing of BRE-mode regular expressions. |
Date: | 2021-01-08 17:16:20 |
Message-ID: | E1kxvN6-0002xM-4o@gemulon.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Fix ancient bug in parsing of BRE-mode regular expressions.
brenext(), when parsing a '*' quantifier, forgot to return any "value"
for the token; per the equivalent case in next(), it should return
value 1 to indicate that greedy rather than non-greedy behavior is
wanted. The result is that the compiled regexp could behave like 'x*?'
rather than the intended 'x*', if we were unlucky enough to have
a zero in v->nextvalue at this point. That seems to happen with some
reliability if we have '.*' at the beginning of a BRE-mode regexp,
although that depends on the initial contents of a stack-allocated
struct, so it's not guaranteed to fail.
Found by Alexander Lakhin using valgrind testing. This bug seems
to be aboriginal in Spencer's code, so back-patch all the way.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16814-6c5e3edd2bdf0d50@postgresql.org
Branch
------
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/085a1cfb3d5fd767eb66e7c5bd7ed7818a7d717f
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/regex/regc_lex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-01-08 23:12:15 | pgsql: Fix plpgsql tests for debug_invalidate_system_caches_always. |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-01-08 01:48:09 | Re: pgsql: createdb: Fix quoting of --encoding, --lc-ctype and --lc-collate |