| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | pgsql: Remove isolation test reindex-partitions |
| Date: | 2020-09-08 02:29:48 |
| Message-ID: | E1kFTOG-0006Zy-CQ@gemulon.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Remove isolation test reindex-partitions
The isolation test added by a6642b3 is proving to be unstable, as once
the first transaction holding a lock on the top-most partitioned table
or on a partition commits, the commit order of the follow-up DROP TABLE
and REINDEX could become reversed depending on the timing.
The only part of the test that could be entirely reliable is the one
using a SHARE lock, allowing REINDEX to commit first, but it is the
least interesting of the set.
Per buildfarm members rorqual and mylodon.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1kFSBj-00062c-Mu@gemulon.postgresql.org
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6785974287afa27221a49ae7202ea3d0695c0a84
Modified Files
--------------
src/test/isolation/expected/reindex-partitions.out | 107 ---------------------
src/test/isolation/isolation_schedule | 1 -
src/test/isolation/specs/reindex-partitions.spec | 59 ------------
3 files changed, 167 deletions(-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-08 02:39:12 | Re: pgsql: Add support for partitioned tables and indexes in REINDEX |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-08 02:16:25 | Re: pgsql: Add support for partitioned tables and indexes in REINDEX |