| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Readd use of TAP subtests |
| Date: | 2021-12-09 20:54:36 |
| Message-ID: | E1CA0ABA-4F51-456B-93E5-4CDCE9CE4B79@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 8 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think the main point is to make sure that the test script reached an
> intended exit point, rather than dying early someplace. It's not apparent
> to me why reaching a done_testing() call is a less reliable indicator of
> that than executing some specific number of tests --- and I agree with
> ilmari that maintaining the test count is a serious PITA.
FWIW I agree with this and am in favor of using done_testing().
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-12-09 21:04:43 | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? |
| Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2021-12-09 20:32:53 | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? |