| From: | Вилен Тамбовцев <v(dot)tambovtsev(at)outlook(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #8469: Xpath behaviour unintuitive / arguably wrong |
| Date: | 2015-02-03 22:13:03 |
| Message-ID: | DUB125-W620D34D40D70CD216DCAD9933D0@phx.gbl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Actually, xpath()'s output is not original XML, at least there must be a function like XML_UNESCAPE() for current behavior
otherwise there is no way to get proper xml with xpath
--
Вилен Тамбовцев
----------------------------------------
> From: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> To: v(dot)tambovtsev(at)outlook(dot)com
> CC: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8469: Xpath behaviour unintuitive / arguably wrong
> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 17:09:34 -0500
>
> =?iso-8859-5?B?stjb1d0gwtDc0d7S5tXS?= <v(dot)tambovtsev(at)outlook(dot)com> writes:
>> Any news on this bug? 9.4 still behaves wrong and this actively stops us from using Postgresql as a storage for our xml docs.
>
> AFAICS the conclusion in that thread was that the current behavior is
> correct; in particular xpath()'s output is still XML and so it must not
> de-escape anything.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/72DA66D9-0222-4888-AF55-61D3337CAC7A@phlo.org
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | lostcentaur | 2015-02-03 22:52:42 | BUG #12734: Postgresql not started after reboot |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-02-03 22:09:34 | Re: BUG #8469: Xpath behaviour unintuitive / arguably wrong |