From: | Вилен Тамбовцев <v(dot)tambovtsev(at)outlook(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #8469: Xpath behaviour unintuitive / arguably wrong |
Date: | 2015-02-04 08:13:44 |
Message-ID: | DUB125-W45415FDBC49148649B85B933A0@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Well, I had a conversation with Bruce Momjian he said that they added this bug to TODO list.
Almost 2 years has passed since and the bug is still here.
IMO this bug is actually a blocker for XML code part since xpath is core functionality.
--
Вилен Тамбовцев
> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 23:22:54 -0700
> From: david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com
> To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8469: Xpath behaviour unintuitive / arguably wrong
>
> Вилен Тамбовцев-2 wrote
>> Actually, xpath()'s output is not original XML, at least there must be a
>> function like XML_UNESCAPE() for current behavior
>> otherwise there is no way to get proper xml with xpath
>
> Based upon the link provided this has been acknowledged.
>
> My personal opinion is that this is a bug (via omission) that the patch
> introduced and that said patch author or committer should work to rectify.
> Our XML/xpath handling is a large brick shy of a load if we do not provide a
> way to make Unescaped text extraction possible.
>
> David J.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Re-BUG-8469-Xpath-behaviour-unintuitive-arguably-wrong-tp5836629p5836676.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Elijah Zupancic | 2015-02-05 00:08:07 | pg_dump search path issue |
Previous Message | David G Johnston | 2015-02-04 06:22:54 | Re: BUG #8469: Xpath behaviour unintuitive / arguably wrong |