Re: pgjdbc-ng

I will look into support for 9.1. I started with 9.2 purely because it was the latest release at the time and I thought it would take a whole lot longer to get to where we are at.

On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Heikki,
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>> That should be easy to fix. Looking at PGtype, where the query is coming
>> from, all you need to do is add another version of the query without the
>> reference to pg_range. The logic for sending a different version of the
>> query depending on the server version is already there.
>
> I haven't taken a look at the code because IIRC they didn't want to
> bloat the driver with support for old versions.
>
> From my point of view, 9.1 would be the perfect starting point as it's
> still widely in production and it will probably stay that way for a
> while. But there may be good reasons to not support it.
>
> If support for 9.1 is something they are interested in, we can take a
> look at it. Just ping me.
>
> --
> Guillaume