| From: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgjdbc-ng |
| Date: | 2014-02-25 15:12:32 |
| Message-ID: | CALt0+o8DGNFRBFiTkZmcCD0TG32_bGLCOG44J0zNo856RycD9Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Heikki,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> That should be easy to fix. Looking at PGtype, where the query is coming
> from, all you need to do is add another version of the query without the
> reference to pg_range. The logic for sending a different version of the
> query depending on the server version is already there.
I haven't taken a look at the code because IIRC they didn't want to
bloat the driver with support for old versions.
From my point of view, 9.1 would be the perfect starting point as it's
still widely in production and it will probably stay that way for a
while. But there may be good reasons to not support it.
If support for 9.1 is something they are interested in, we can take a
look at it. Just ping me.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Wooten | 2014-02-25 15:45:12 | Re: pgjdbc-ng |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-02-25 15:01:20 | Re: pgjdbc-ng |