Re: Strange problem with turning WAL archiving on

From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "BK *EXTERN*" <bero(at)artsuici(dot)de>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strange problem with turning WAL archiving on
Date: 2011-12-01 09:34:29
Message-ID: D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2072DFAE6@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

BK wrote:
[server complains that wal_level is not set correctly]
>> Did you change the correct postgresql.conf?
>> Are there more than one lines for wal_level in the file
>> (try "grep wal_level postgresql.conf")?
>
> I tried greping, there is just one nstance of it and is set on
archive.
>
> Any other ideas what could have gone wrong in this strange situation?

Could you send me postgresql.conf (offlist) so that I can have a look at
it?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Mitchell 2011-12-01 10:49:32 sql statements using access frontend
Previous Message Sergey Konoplev 2011-12-01 08:08:25 Re: Is it possible to make a streaming replication faster using COPY instead of lots of INSERTS?