From: | BK <bero(at)artsuici(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Strange problem with turning WAL archiving on |
Date: | 2011-11-30 16:23:35 |
Message-ID: | 6B5AC491-57E2-47BF-B374-0C5745D1267C@artsuici.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Albe,
On Nov 30, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Verify the current setting with
>
> SELECT setting, source, boot_val, reset_val,
> sourcefile, sourceline
> FROM pg_settings WHERE name = 'wal_level';
>
> If the setting is not right (which is likely the case), try to find out
> the cause.
This query shows that the settings are still on minimal. Strange. As I can see there is just one postgresql.conf file (in the data directory) of the 9.1 installation. Everything is changed inside it according to the specs. Wal_level is on archive. I even tried renaming the file, to see if when I reboot PostgreSQL I would get an error. I got an error and therefor it is the .conf that the DBMS uses.
> Did you change the correct postgresql.conf?
> Are there more than one lines for wal_level in the file
> (try "grep wal_level postgresql.conf")?
I tried greping, there is just one nstance of it and is set on archive.
Any other ideas what could have gone wrong in this strange situation?
Best regards,
BK
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Edson Richter | 2011-11-30 16:41:52 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 and asynchronous replication through VPN |
Previous Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2011-11-30 14:32:04 | Is it possible to make a streaming replication faster using COPY instead of lots of INSERTS? |