From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page *EXTERN*" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Suggestion for pgAgent |
Date: | 2009-11-17 07:50:06 |
Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C20393803E@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
> > I asked this question on pgadmin-general before, and
> > there was no reply. Maybe this list is more appropriate.
> >
> > When you configure an SQL job step, you can configure a database
> > on which the script should run, but you cannot specify a database user.
> >
> > I'd like to define schedules for various database users, and
> > while it would be possible to work around the limitation by
> > writing some wrapper functions in the database, the best thing
> > from my perspective would be to enhance pgAgent (and pgAdmin III)
> > to support a database user that pgAgent uses to connect to
> > execute a certain job step.
> >
> > Is that an option? I think it would be a valuable addition,
> > and it would alleviate one of the "security concerns" stated
> > in the documentation.
>
> Sure, it's definitely an option - provided it can be done in a secure
> way. Want to work on it?
I should be able to change pgAgent accordingly, but I am not an
accomplished GUI programmer and have no experience with wxWidgets,
so I don't want to promise that I can do the necessary modifications
in pgAdmin.
Can you think of any security concerns?
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashesh Vashi | 2009-11-17 12:35:05 | Re: PATCH(WIP): Printing Support And Save GQB/Explain as an image |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-11-17 04:38:10 | Re: Suggestion for pgAgent |