From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Suggestion for pgAgent |
Date: | 2009-11-17 04:38:10 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10911162038k3c0dc223u9ede968e7d18923c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> Dear hackers,
>
> I asked this question on pgadmin-general before, and
> there was no reply. Maybe this list is more appropriate.
>
> When you configure an SQL job step, you can configure a database
> on which the script should run, but you cannot specify a database user.
>
> I'd like to define schedules for various database users, and
> while it would be possible to work around the limitation by
> writing some wrapper functions in the database, the best thing
> from my perspective would be to enhance pgAgent (and pgAdmin III)
> to support a database user that pgAgent uses to connect to
> execute a certain job step.
>
> Is that an option? I think it would be a valuable addition,
> and it would alleviate one of the "security concerns" stated
> in the documentation.
Sure, it's definitely an option - provided it can be done in a secure
way. Want to work on it?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2009-11-17 07:50:06 | Re: Suggestion for pgAgent |
Previous Message | pgAdmin Trac | 2009-11-16 18:13:51 | Re: [pgAdmin III] #91: Text Search Configuration Mapping displayed out of order, pgAdmin 1.10.0 |