From: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle |
Date: | 2002-05-29 00:50:21 |
Message-ID: | D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CECF@voyager.corporate.connx.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 5:37 PM
> To: Andrew Sullivan
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit
> puzzle
>
>
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 09:00:43PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > TODO updated:
> > >
> > > Add BSD-licensed qsort() for 32-bit Solaris
> >
> > I've received an email noting that someone else ran a test program
> > with the 64 bit library, and had just as bad performance as the 32
> > bit one. I haven't had a chance to look at it yet, but it suggests
> > that the result is still inconclusive. Maybe, if just one more fire
> > goes out here, I can look at it this week.
>
> TODO reverted to be:
>
> Add BSD-licensed qsort() for Solaris
>
> My guess is that your test case didn't tickle the bug.
I am the author of several special sort functions [I wrote the sorting
chapter in this book: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton/unleashed/]
I would be happy to contribute sort routines to the project under the
Berkeley style license.
Likely (if C++ is allowed) a large efficiency gain can be had through
the use of templates.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-05-29 00:54:25 | Re: Replication status |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-05-29 00:48:59 | Re: Replication status |