| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication status |
| Date: | 2002-05-29 00:48:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200205290048.g4T0mx823926@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:40:20AM -0400, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> > could anyone please enlighten me about the status of replication? I do
> > expect lots of questions about this, and I'm not really sure if I can
> > promise it for 7.3. :-)
>
> 8.0 ;-) (?)
>
> I add the other quesion: how is current status of on-line backup log
> based on WAL? The enterprise usage require it maybe more than
> replication.
Yes! Point-in-time recovery and replication are our only to "urgent"
items on the TODO list.
Jan's idea of implementing point-in-time recovery as a playback of the
replication logs seems like a great idea, so I think replication may
solve both issues.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2002-05-29 00:50:21 | Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-05-29 00:37:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle |