Re: Is OpenFTS dead?

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: howachen(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is OpenFTS dead?
Date: 2006-07-09 05:34:52
Message-ID: D8F40FFC-1156-45B2-BE43-86F9D30738AA@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Jul 8, 2006, at 9:57 , howachen(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:

> FTS will get more and more important for a DBMS system, i think pgsql
> should also consider improving this, isn't?

I believe a very common FTS solution used with PostgreSQL is
tsearch2, which is included in contrib/. Have you looked at tsearch2?
Does it meet your needs?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-07-09 05:45:48 Re: Getting Primary Key Value After Insert
Previous Message Richard Broersma Jr 2006-07-09 05:25:02 Re: Getting Primary Key Value After Insert