From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, howachen(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Is OpenFTS dead? |
Date: | 2006-07-10 03:43:10 |
Message-ID: | 200607092043.11266.jd@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Saturday 08 July 2006 22:34, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2006, at 9:57 , howachen(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> > FTS will get more and more important for a DBMS system, i think pgsql
> > should also consider improving this, isn't?
>
> I believe a very common FTS solution used with PostgreSQL is
> tsearch2, which is included in contrib/. Have you looked at tsearch2?
> Does it meet your needs?
OpenFTS sits on top of Tsearch2. All it is is some high level apis
(perl/python) to create a search engine using PostgreSQL and Tsearch2.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Michael Glaesemann
> grzm seespotcode net
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron St-Pierre | 2006-07-10 03:43:11 | Autovacuum Logging Info? |
Previous Message | nuno | 2006-07-10 03:35:39 | having indexes when clearing tables |