Re: Is OpenFTS dead?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, howachen(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Is OpenFTS dead?
Date: 2006-07-10 03:43:10
Message-ID: 200607092043.11266.jd@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Saturday 08 July 2006 22:34, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2006, at 9:57 , howachen(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> > FTS will get more and more important for a DBMS system, i think pgsql
> > should also consider improving this, isn't?
>
> I believe a very common FTS solution used with PostgreSQL is
> tsearch2, which is included in contrib/. Have you looked at tsearch2?
> Does it meet your needs?

OpenFTS sits on top of Tsearch2. All it is is some high level apis
(perl/python) to create a search engine using PostgreSQL and Tsearch2.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Michael Glaesemann
> grzm seespotcode net
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron St-Pierre 2006-07-10 03:43:11 Autovacuum Logging Info?
Previous Message nuno 2006-07-10 03:35:39 having indexes when clearing tables