| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas |
| Date: | 2002-06-03 19:09:26 |
| Message-ID: | D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF61015313@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Following my discussion with Tom on -hackers a while ago about finding
the full schema search path, I decided to give it a go myself and
hopefully both learn something, and give Tom one less thing to do!
Attached is the result which seems to work OK here. The existing
current_schemas() works as previously, & I have added
current_schemas(bool) which will return the full implicit/explicit path
if passed true or the explicit path is pass false.
Thorough checking is advised in case I've done something nasty or missed
something I was unaware of (being my first venture into the backend
code) :-)
Regards, Dave.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| current_schemas.diff | application/octet-stream | 1.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-06-05 18:28:13 | Re: Truncate |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-06-03 17:42:13 | Re: Python DB API (pgdb.py) patch |