| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas |
| Date: | 2002-06-09 19:46:21 |
| Message-ID: | 6967.1023651981@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> Attached is the result which seems to work OK here. The existing
> current_schemas() works as previously, & I have added
> current_schemas(bool) which will return the full implicit/explicit path
> if passed true or the explicit path is pass false.
This patch will break the existing current_schemas() function AFAICS;
the code will be testing a value that it wasn't passed, and getting a
random result, so it's unclear which behavior you'd get.
Since current_schemas() isn't in any released code yet, it's not by
any means set in stone. I'd be willing to simply change it to take a
boolean parameter always. Comments anyone?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2002-06-09 20:16:15 | Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-09 15:59:55 | Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API |