From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Date: | 2009-01-26 10:20:11 |
Message-ID: | D56468039889DD0FA27DDB1A@amenophis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
--On 25. Januar 2009 13:36:35 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> But per spec, UPDATABLE should be the default (if not now, then
> eventually). Are you proposing
> CREATE [OR REPLACE] [[NOT] UPDATABLE] VIEW ...
> ? Seems confusing.
Good point. We need a better phrasing to restore the old behavior, maybe
CREATE [OR REPLACE] [READ ONLY|UPDATABLE] VIEW ...?
I think this looks less confusing.
Bernd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT | 2009-01-26 11:48:24 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-01-26 10:19:44 | pgsql: Message format tuning |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-01-26 10:28:03 | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2009-01-26 10:18:13 | Re: Hot standby, dropping a tablespace |