From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |
Date: | 2009-01-26 10:28:03 |
Message-ID: | 1232965683.2327.1535.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 12:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> If we want to ensure that 8.5 development opens soon, what we have to
> do is reject those two patches, revert updatable views, and finish up
> the other stuff (which is all small and could likely be dealt with in
> a week or two). That puts us in position to go beta by perhaps
> mid-February with release perhaps on May 1. If we don't, I hereby
> predict that 8.4 release will not happen before September. Trying to
> deal with those late, large features will add *at least* one more
> month to commitfest and *at least* one more month to beta (you think
> they'll be bug-free?).
> As our new president has been reminding us, it's time to start making
> hard choices.
We're clearly ahead of where we were in 8.3. Any release with big
features in it will take longer, whether you wait a year, or not.
I think the choice here is currently between features or release
schedule, but we could look at things differently and generate some
other options.
What would our users want?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2009-01-26 10:44:56 | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |
Previous Message | Bernd Helmle | 2009-01-26 10:20:11 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |