Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register

From: "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Christoph Berg" <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Fabien COELHO" <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register
Date: 2024-10-25 20:07:10
Message-ID: D555PB7PK59U.39ZL3TA0X6NC2@partin.io
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri Oct 25, 2024 at 3:04 PM CDT, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> writes:
>> Should the removal of "register" be backported to support that better?
>
> Perhaps. It's early days yet, but nobody has complained that that
> broke anything in v16, so I'm guessing it'd be fine.

FWIW, I ran into this compiling an extension written in C++ for v15, so
I'll throw my support for backpatching this if that is still on the
table. Understandable if not, though.

--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-10-25 20:19:25 Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-10-25 19:25:59 Re: Parallel heap vacuum