| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)partin(dot)io> |
| Cc: | "Christoph Berg" <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Fabien COELHO" <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Subject: | Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register |
| Date: | 2024-10-25 20:19:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3055138.1729887565@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)partin(dot)io> writes:
> FWIW, I ran into this compiling an extension written in C++ for v15, so
> I'll throw my support for backpatching this if that is still on the
> table. Understandable if not, though.
I'm inclined to think "too late". Even if we back-patched to v15
and earlier now, your extension would probably still want to be
compilable against earlier minor releases, so the back-patch
would not help you a lot. Christoph's workaround of
"#define register" is probably the best answer for old PG versions,
or you can compile with "-Wno-register".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tristan Partin | 2024-10-25 20:24:46 | Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register |
| Previous Message | Tristan Partin | 2024-10-25 20:07:10 | Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register |