From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-General-List (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: standard schemas for addresses, others? |
Date: | 2003-01-24 00:20:40 |
Message-ID: | D42RQE9ICTRA7XWHEE0NTOPOUT9GA.3e3086d8@cal-lab |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Oh,
but I WANT customers everywhere, and ....
my money for nothing and my chicks for free of course! Just trying to plan ahead for
when I can hire everyone else on this list!
I guess I've been spending too much time next to a monitor :-)
1/23/2003 3:30:49 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>Dennis Gearon writes:
>
>> Are there any sites with 'standard schemas' for certain, repetitive
>> database needs? For example, addresses and their components. Does anyone
>> have a schema for addresses that will work for the USA *AND* internation
>> addresses?
>
>No chance. You need to cut a compromise between structure and
>flexibility. If you just want to save, say, shipping addresses, then make
>them free text -- person name, address information, country. (Possibly
>divide the address information into street'ish and city'ish, but that's
>already pushing it.) If you need the addresses to be structured so you
>can do data analysis then you need to define your actual needs. Probably
>you don't have customers *everywhere*.
>
>--
>Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-01-24 01:26:56 | Compiling 7.2.3 on RH 8.0 |
Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2003-01-24 00:01:06 | Re: Optimizer too eager to choose full table scans |