Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication?

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: "Darcy Buskermolen" <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Subject: Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication?
Date: 2005-12-08 19:33:49
Message-ID: D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154757D34C@postal.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

A general purpose log miner is also useful in many other areas besides
replication.

________________________________

From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Jonah H. Harris
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:32 AM
To: Jim C. Nasby
Cc: Darcy Buskermolen; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Tom Lane;
Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HOOKS for Synchronous Replication?

On 12/8/05, Jim C. Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:

While this code might be useful, whouldn't it be much more
valuable to
provide hooks into xlog so that we could do non-trigger-based
replication? (As well as non-trigger-based materialized
views...)

If we're going to do hooks for replication, I think we should look at
including xlog. Trigger-based replication is an OLTP performance killer
if you're just looking to do async replication.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2005-12-08 19:35:27 Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication?
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2005-12-08 19:32:19 Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication?