From: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Darcy Buskermolen" <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Subject: | Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? |
Date: | 2005-12-08 19:33:49 |
Message-ID: | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154757D34C@postal.corporate.connx.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
A general purpose log miner is also useful in many other areas besides
replication.
________________________________
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Jonah H. Harris
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:32 AM
To: Jim C. Nasby
Cc: Darcy Buskermolen; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Tom Lane;
Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HOOKS for Synchronous Replication?
On 12/8/05, Jim C. Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
While this code might be useful, whouldn't it be much more
valuable to
provide hooks into xlog so that we could do non-trigger-based
replication? (As well as non-trigger-based materialized
views...)
If we're going to do hooks for replication, I think we should look at
including xlog. Trigger-based replication is an OLTP performance killer
if you're just looking to do async replication.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2005-12-08 19:35:27 | Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-12-08 19:32:19 | Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? |