| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? |
| Date: | 2005-12-08 19:32:19 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920512081132k6a9e38a0mf2d5fad3fd2769e2@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/8/05, Jim C. Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
>
> While this code might be useful, whouldn't it be much more valuable to
> provide hooks into xlog so that we could do non-trigger-based
> replication? (As well as non-trigger-based materialized views...)
>
If we're going to do hooks for replication, I think we should look at
including xlog. Trigger-based replication is an OLTP performance killer if
you're just looking to do async replication.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-12-08 19:33:49 | Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2005-12-08 19:23:43 | Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? |