Re: INSERT or UPDATE

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INSERT or UPDATE
Date: 2009-04-07 00:49:07
Message-ID: D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154702962120@postal.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James B. Byrne [mailto:byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca]
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 5:43 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [GENERAL] INSERT or UPDATE
>
>
> On Mon, April 6, 2009 20:23, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> >
> > If a transaction involves rows where some succeed and some fail,
> > all will roll back. If that is the desired behavior, or if all
> > operations are singleton, then you won't see any problems.
> >
>
> Do I understand correctly that this means that even if the function
> "handles" a failed insert then if the function occurs inside a
> transaction then that transaction fails and is rolled back
> regardless?

It depends on how it is handled. You could certainly (for instance) use
a cursor and perform the operations one by one.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ljb 2009-04-07 01:52:05 Anyone testing changes to libpq/bcc32.mak?
Previous Message James B. Byrne 2009-04-07 00:42:47 Re: INSERT or UPDATE