| From: | "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT or UPDATE |
| Date: | 2009-04-07 00:42:47 |
| Message-ID: | 60357.65.92.52.21.1239064967.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, April 6, 2009 20:23, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> If a transaction involves rows where some succeed and some fail,
> all will roll back. If that is the desired behavior, or if all
> operations are singleton, then you won't see any problems.
>
Do I understand correctly that this means that even if the function
"handles" a failed insert then if the function occurs inside a
transaction then that transaction fails and is rolled back
regardless?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB(at)Harte-Lyne(dot)ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2009-04-07 00:49:07 | Re: INSERT or UPDATE |
| Previous Message | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo | 2009-04-07 00:25:56 | media server (mp3 player) on postgresql |