Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, brian(dot)williams(at)mayalane(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Date: 2019-11-08 13:51:57
Message-ID: D22F770F-DBE4-4688-93FE-E1F3F5DF8111@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

> On 8 Nov 2019, at 14:10, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-Nov-08, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> Agreed. I like your suggestion, or the inverse of it: "a database without any
>> user defined objects".
>
> Here's a proposed patch.

+1, LGTM

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-11-08 14:56:22 Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-11-08 13:10:14 Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced