Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, brian(dot)williams(at)mayalane(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Date: 2019-11-08 13:10:14
Message-ID: 20191108131014.GA27568@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 2019-Nov-08, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

> Agreed. I like your suggestion, or the inverse of it: "a database without any
> user defined objects".

Here's a proposed patch.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-No-more-virgins.patch text/x-diff 2.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2019-11-08 13:51:57 Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2019-11-08 08:52:48 Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced