Re: JDBC driver versions

From: Ramsey Gurley <rgurley(at)smarthealth(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JDBC driver versions
Date: 2013-04-16 20:54:18
Message-ID: D1CF6005-6D03-4ED3-8538-C6E8CBF6CA2B@smarthealth.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Okay, I saw that, but I just wanted to double check. It seemed odd that there were builds going all the way back to 8.2 if the 9.2 version should work for everything.

Thanks for the reassurance :-)

Ramsey

On Apr 16, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:

> On 04/16/2013 01:13 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm migrating from postgres 8.3 to 9.2. Included in my application is an old jar for the JDBC driver for the 8.3 database. Do I need a separate build with an up to date JDBC jar for 9.2 while I am testing out a new database or is it safe to use the latest JDBC jar with a very old version of postgres?
>
> From here:
> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html#current
>
> "
> Current Version
>
> This is the current version of the driver. Unless you have unusual requirements (running old applications or JVMs), this is the driver you should be using. It supports Postgresql 7.2 or newer and requires a 1.5 or newer JVM. It contains support for SSL and the javax.sql package. It comes in two flavours, JDBC3 and JDBC4. If you are using the 1.6 or 1.7 JVM, then you should use the JDBC4 version.
>
> "
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ramsey
>>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Moshe Jacobson 2013-04-16 20:55:49 Re: Can you spot the difference?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-04-16 20:48:30 Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL