From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ramsey Gurley <rgurley(at)smarthealth(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: JDBC driver versions |
Date: | 2013-04-16 20:36:10 |
Message-ID: | 516DB63A.2090309@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 04/16/2013 01:13 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm migrating from postgres 8.3 to 9.2. Included in my application is an old jar for the JDBC driver for the 8.3 database. Do I need a separate build with an up to date JDBC jar for 9.2 while I am testing out a new database or is it safe to use the latest JDBC jar with a very old version of postgres?
From here:
http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html#current
"
Current Version
This is the current version of the driver. Unless you have unusual
requirements (running old applications or JVMs), this is the driver you
should be using. It supports Postgresql 7.2 or newer and requires a 1.5
or newer JVM. It contains support for SSL and the javax.sql package. It
comes in two flavours, JDBC3 and JDBC4. If you are using the 1.6 or 1.7
JVM, then you should use the JDBC4 version.
"
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ramsey
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John R Pierce | 2013-04-16 20:38:34 | Re: Mysterious table that exists but doesn't exist |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2013-04-16 20:35:57 | Re: JDBC driver versions |