| From: | Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Wolff, Ken L" <ken(dot)l(dot)wolff(at)lmco(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Netapp SnapCenter |
| Date: | 2020-06-22 05:30:18 |
| Message-ID: | D0D2ED86-87F4-4F7A-B0B1-FFE14EB3D65E@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Magnus,
> On 21. Jun, 2020, at 21:35, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> One not uncommon case is for example being able to provision a new replica while a backup is running. Since replicas are provisioned starting off a base backup, being able to run that concurrently is very useful. Especially if base backups take a long time to run.
hmm, a backup shouldn't take so long as to delay a base backup significantly. But that's just my opinion. I may be a little snapshot biased, though, where it only takes a few seconds. :-)
Cheers,
Paul
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-06-22 05:36:10 | Re: Netapp SnapCenter |
| Previous Message | raf | 2020-06-22 05:20:55 | Re: Hiding a GUC from SQL |