From: | Scott Whitney <scott(at)journyx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Shutdown Order with Primary/Standby? |
Date: | 2017-08-10 18:10:12 |
Message-ID: | CY4PR11MB15753E6D6B56898A25D9A01CA7880@CY4PR11MB1575.namprd11.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Exactly what I would do, yes.
________________________________
From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org> on behalf of Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 12:59 PM
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [ADMIN] Shutdown Order with Primary/Standby?
Extending that scenario, if you had a cascading standby, would you go primary -> upstream standby -> downstream standby?
die Seilerwerks<http://www.seiler.us/>
www.seiler.us
We use VictorOps for our paging/notification system, and we're pretty happy with it so far. On the DBA team, we've just been using a simple email gateway to send ...
Journyx, Inc.
7600 Burnet Road #300
Austin, TX 78757
www.journyx.com
p 512.834.8888
f 512-834-8858
Do you receive our promotional emails? Click here <http://journyx.com/communication-preferences> or visit http://journyx.com/communication-preferences to unsubscribe.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2017-08-10 18:13:12 | Re: Shutdown Order with Primary/Standby? |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2017-08-10 18:01:25 | Re: Performance impact for enabling Log_disconnections |