From: | Stephen Froehlich <s(dot)froehlich(at)cablelabs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | J B <mrjanbernat(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de> |
Cc: | "pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: WAL settings |
Date: | 2018-02-14 21:51:00 |
Message-ID: | CY1PR0601MB19277EA2372E076A7106D51FE5F50@CY1PR0601MB1927.namprd06.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
10 is the default value, as is wal_level = “replica”.
By the way, if you had checked your postgresql-10-main.log after you sent the reload command (always a good idea), it gives exactly this hint as I remember.
--Stephen
From: J B [mailto:mrjanbernat(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:10 AM
To: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL settings
Wow thank you, i checked that this was commented out in 9.4 but with setting = 0, but 10.1 has this commented with = 10 so i assume its default value.
2018-02-14 13:50 GMT+01:00 Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de<mailto:andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>>:
Am 14.02.2018 um 13:33 schrieb J B:
Hello
I have an issue with WAL settings with postgress 10.1 used for zabbix monitoring system. When i change WAL setting to "minimal" the database goes down. We used this setting in version 9.4 to improve performance of our monitoring server so i would like to replicate this setting.
you have to set max_wal_senders to 0.
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com<http://www.2ndQuadrant.com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | J B | 2018-02-14 21:57:02 | RE: WAL settings |
Previous Message | Stephen Froehlich | 2018-02-14 21:47:07 | RE: Bitmap Heap Scan taking ~60x as long for table when queried as partition |