RE: WAL settings

From: Stephen Froehlich <s(dot)froehlich(at)cablelabs(dot)com>
To: J B <mrjanbernat(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: WAL settings
Date: 2018-02-14 21:51:00
Message-ID: CY1PR0601MB19277EA2372E076A7106D51FE5F50@CY1PR0601MB1927.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

10 is the default value, as is wal_level = “replica”.

By the way, if you had checked your postgresql-10-main.log after you sent the reload command (always a good idea), it gives exactly this hint as I remember.

--Stephen

From: J B [mailto:mrjanbernat(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:10 AM
To: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL settings

Wow thank you, i checked that this was commented out in 9.4 but with setting = 0, but 10.1 has this commented with = 10 so i assume its default value.

2018-02-14 13:50 GMT+01:00 Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de<mailto:andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>>:

Am 14.02.2018 um 13:33 schrieb J B:
Hello

I have an issue with WAL settings with postgress 10.1 used for zabbix monitoring system. When i change WAL setting to "minimal" the database goes down. We used this setting in version 9.4 to improve performance of our monitoring server so i would like to replicate this setting.

you have to set max_wal_senders to 0.

Regards, Andreas

--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com<http://www.2ndQuadrant.com>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J B 2018-02-14 21:57:02 RE: WAL settings
Previous Message Stephen Froehlich 2018-02-14 21:47:07 RE: Bitmap Heap Scan taking ~60x as long for table when queried as partition