RE: WAL settings

I was not able to google out the proper log file to look into,ill try it
next time,thank you

Dne 14. 2. 2018 10:51 odpoledne napsal uživatel "Stephen Froehlich" <
s(dot)froehlich(at)cablelabs(dot)com>:

> 10 is the default value, as is wal_level = “replica”.
>
>
>
> By the way, if you had checked your postgresql-10-main.log after you sent
> the reload command (always a good idea), it gives exactly this hint as I
> remember.
>
>
>
> --Stephen
>
>
>
> *From:* J B [mailto:mrjanbernat(at)gmail(dot)com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:10 AM
> *To:* Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
> *Cc:* pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
> *Subject:* Re: WAL settings
>
>
>
> Wow thank you, i checked that this was commented out in 9.4 but with
> setting = 0, but 10.1 has this commented with = 10 so i assume its default
> value.
>
>
>
> 2018-02-14 13:50 GMT+01:00 Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>:
>
>
>
> Am 14.02.2018 um 13:33 schrieb J B:
>
> Hello
>
> I have an issue with WAL settings with postgress 10.1 used for zabbix
> monitoring system. When i change WAL setting to "minimal" the database goes
> down. We used this setting in version 9.4 to improve performance of our
> monitoring server so i would like to replicate this setting.
>
>
> you have to set max_wal_senders to 0.
>
>
> Regards, Andreas
>
> --
> 2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
> www.2ndQuadrant.com
>
>
>