| From: | "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Fix some wording in WAL docs |
| Date: | 2023-09-05 20:38:38 |
| Message-ID: | CVB9URWWSAFM.23RTDTR8W6VHF@neon.tech |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I was reading through the page and noticed this portion which didn't
sound quite right. I am hoping that I captured the original intent
correctly. Please let me know if something should be changed and/or
reflowed, since I am not sure what best practices are when editing the
docs. I did notice that this same wording issue has existed since
428b1d6.
--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Fix-some-wording-in-WAL-docs.patch | text/x-patch | 1.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Christensen | 2023-09-05 20:57:06 | Re: Initdb-time block size specification |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-09-05 20:23:29 | Re: Initdb-time block size specification |