From: | David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Initdb-time block size specification |
Date: | 2023-09-05 20:57:06 |
Message-ID: | CAOxo6XLr97Hx9q3fg1XvRvSVNZ9fh1DDXt7D_aGOF3OLXRje9A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:52 PM Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Something I also asked at this years Unconference - Do we currently
> have Build Farm animals testing with different page sizes ?
>
> I'd say that testing all sizes from 4KB up (so 4, 8, 16, 32) should be
> done at least before each release if not continuously.
>
> -- Cheers
>
> Hannu
The regression tests currently have a lot of breakage when running
against non-standard block sizes, so I would assume the answer here is
no. I would expect that we will want to add regression test variants
or otherwise normalize results so they will work with differing block
sizes, but have not done that yet.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2023-09-05 21:02:21 | Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription |
Previous Message | Tristan Partin | 2023-09-05 20:38:38 | Fix some wording in WAL docs |