Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Thursday, November 01, 2007 10:30:38 +0100 Magnus Hagander
<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> Dave Page wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>>>>> I haven't noticed, but haven't been watchign for it ... can you send me
>>>>> full headers of one such affected? This one here seemed to be 'within
>>>>> minutes' :(
>>>> Here's headers from a message I sent to -core today, which had about an
>>>> hour turnaround ...
>>> That one is clearly sitting waiting to go through the hub.org antispam
>>> for about an hour (between 18:33 ADT and 19:35 ADT).
>>>
>>> Oh, and the message you sent with this info just took about over 4 hours
>>> to get here, which happens fairly often. Headers from this one:
>>
>> It sat in the mod queue until I approved it earlier.
>
> Ah, that may explain some of the delays I've been seeing. But only those
> between those two hops (postgresql -> hub) I guess.

Probably alot of the problems you've been seeing have to do with moderator
approval times for some posts ... Tom doesn't usually let me go very long with
big delays before letting me know there "might be a problem" ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHKbY/4QvfyHIvDvMRAqehAKDSwRGjk9+f3M9j/ln5OyOy2RV61wCgp/XA
PqDh7vJH3jzNjmMuVwWSZbA=
=K9py
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----