From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Joe Hellerstein's "Looking Back at Postgres" paper |
Date: | 2024-07-04 20:35:36 |
Message-ID: | CEB105E9-25C3-4C85-8AEB-F5E50B4E3A25@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> On 4 Jul 2024, at 22:22, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 4 Jul 2024, at 07:40, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I happened to come across this:
>>> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.01973
>>> I found this to be really interesting reading, so I wonder if
>>> we shouldn't cite it in history.sgml or some such place.
>
>> It's a really good read, +1 for referencing it in history.sgml. I would
>> probably have placed it at the tail end of 2.1 to wrap up that section or at
>> the very end.
>
> After thinking for awhile, that seemed like burying the lede.
> It's an independent telling of the tale, and could reasonably
> go near the top, as in the attached draft.
Agreed, good idea.
> (I'm not too sure how to cite book chapters in DocBook, so feel
> free to critique that. Also, I noticed that the ports12 item
> was not in alphabetical order, so I moved it.)
Reading the docbook reference I wasn't able to figure out a better way than
what you have done so +1 on going ahead with this version.
>> Unrelated to that, but reading history.sgml I found this sentend at the end of
>> the page to be sort of misleading:
>> "Details about what has happened in PostgreSQL since then can be found
>> in Appendix E."
>
> Fixed that too.
Thanks.
> BTW, I contacted Hellerstein to make sure he's okay with this,
> and he is.
+1
--
Daniel Gustafsson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2024-07-04 22:57:18 | Re: Joe Hellerstein's "Looking Back at Postgres" paper |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-07-04 20:22:58 | Re: Joe Hellerstein's "Looking Back at Postgres" paper |